Of ice and electricity

Photo of what winter weather may look like, westbound at Hawthorn Farm

Steven Vance recently forwarded me a question about why CTA‘s rails have been sparking. Unlike MAX trains which get power from an overhead wire system, their trains get power through a third rail system. However, arcing in both kinds of power systems during winter weather is typically caused by ice. Ice building up on the wire (or third rail as the case may be) acts as an electrical insulator, preventing the carbon shoe from making contact with the wire where the ice accumulates. This interruption in the flow of the current from the wire to the pantograph is visible as arcing.

Here’s a video of a MAX train pulling into & out of a platform where there was some ice on the catenary, and you can easily see the effect that it has:

To help clear ice from the overhead wire & prevent it from accumulating, a few of the Type 1s (107-112) are equipped with ice cutters which are put into use for major freezing rain/ice events. I don’t have a picture of any of them in use (though I’m willing to accept donations!), but they look like a second pantograph and function by heating/scraping ice from the overhead wire. Unlike the pantographs, ice cutters only draw current to heat the elements and not to provide power to the train, so they won’t arc the same way the pantographs do in ice. Their function is strictly to clear ice from the wire.

Pantograph (left) raised, ice cutter (right) lowered

If you’d ever seen one of these cars and wondered why it has two pantographs, wonder no more! It doesn’t – one pantograph, one ice cutter.

View from above; the ice cutter is the one closer to the coupled end, the pantograph is the one in contact with the wire closer to the vantage point. Bonus cameo appearance by car 235

About these ads

7 responses to “Of ice and electricity

  1. Another one of my questions answered! Great post!!

    Matt

  2. I might suggest a change in your statement where you say that “…they look like a second pantograph”…

    I would say that they ARE a second pantograph, just not used for current collection. I think I have a photo of a Type 1 around somewhere with both pantos up…leeme try to find it tonight.

    • Hmm… I see what you’re saying & it makes sense – I just hadn’t thought of it like that, in part because they look similar but not identical (the shape of the bow collector, for example) so I didn’t really equate the two.

      Would love to see that picture if you can find it!

      • Yeah, looked through about 60K photos yesterday for that and a few other things…darn it, couldnt find it. I may have it as video somewhere. I know I had a camera of some kind going to work one icy morning at the intersecton of Burnside and 181st. I brought the camera as I wanted a photo of the second panto. Hopefully I will find it and remember to stop back by and post it….if someone doesnt beat me to the punch! :)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s